The announcement of Google Knols a few months ago has got everyone talking about Google trying to take over from Wikipedia as the de facto “go to” place for facts online.
It was easy to find information on the web before wikipedia, It’s just that the information that you found was often in specialist jargon, or badly written, or just plain wrong. Also when you searched for a term, say “calculus” for instance, there was a number of pages that you had to wade through before you found one that fitted your level of understanding, and you really had no idea if the information that you were reading was from a credible source.
Although wikipedia still has minor problems in these areas, it’s peer reviewed operation allows for the correction of errors by others users. The information known about Knols shows that google is trying to fix some of the problems with wikipedia. It is easy for an error or complete fabrication to slip in to an article and remain detected until someone with more knowledge about the subject happens to read it, and then be bothered enough about the mistruth to change the article themselves. This could take an hour for a widely read important article, or it could never happen if it was a fringe topic of limited popularity. Knols, because they have authorship attributed to a subject expert, will supposedly be a more authoritive version of the facts. This isn’t really new thinking, About.com had topic editors years ago, and squidoo.com lenses allow people to create topics and declare themselves experts on things. I’m not sure that this loss of anonymity of authorship and editorship is going to be a good or a bad thing at this point, but it will soon become clear as Knols have their inevitable gain in popularity.
The good thing about the many authored, anonymous nature of wikipedia is that even if the information provided is not the 100% truth, it is a representation of the consensus reality around the subject, and therefore allows you to converse with other about it, apply the subject to other areas and use the knowledge provided as a tool. It provides enough facts, figures, equations, links to experts, software or other resources to give you the head start, and compress anywhere from 5 minutes to 1 weeks of web surfing about a topic down to the time it takes to read the wikipedia entry. More »